A Social Network discussion, the vegan propaganda is spread by anonyms who are posting advice without proofs.
Fer +fer
GOOGLE.FR
figatellu lentilles - Recherche Google
- J’aime
- · Répondre
- · 1 j
- Non pas les lentilles.
- J’aime
- · Répondre
- · 1 j
lundi 28 décembre 2020
jeudi 17 décembre 2020
mardi 8 décembre 2020
Selenium
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/06/health/ebola-immunity.html?fbclid=IwAR2mDxeV_DRTmbMCEitrQ8QoQ4wNH7bJ51DPhPQq0LUzdksLRLrXQxq2HfE
https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.journalrepository.org%2Fmedia%2Fjournals%2FBJMMR_12%2F2014%2FDec%2FLipinski632014BJMMR14858.pdf%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR3H7WuWHwDlKV3hnBp5MxV3eRv6N1h4_aJ52C47y2mNKP6BjCbAFExx2z0&h=AT3q27RiLXSRow7xErLP4GwBQOHWfZ0sHs_qFc6_O92xGmec8oH6j-oIe8QfNDNej27wVWLN2tHF2SdLQR9aob4F7ovyS9sdYxD4Tmym9vk2Vno3273WJocjmuVhEGNV_yOi-w&__tn__=R]-R&c[0]=AT35KuuP-jc-doNZNUNZU48to8R1VdGgUYhzRmf0CW_tf_UErzZgqiPs1n6uoOwcK_jgwK0qcANQ_VqpNmiP6zMZtAE1UrcutS_WCCWSPJjoJh2T_3JH27jcsKz-XAGjP-rWSEe1W5vEoiL_bAF__ckrpzia7ngHEvetOuapeUoB1hs
file:///Users/GuyAndrePelouze/Documents/Selenium/Lipinski632014BJMMR14858.pdf
The French chemist Louis Pasteur helped us take a huge step forward from these lines of thought when, in the 1860s, he definitively proved the existence of germs as the cause of disease.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12758285/
The terrain
https://juniperpublishers.com/jojnhc/pdf/JOJNHC.MS.ID.555631.pdf
In a speech to a group of students and physicians, Bernard declared, “The terrain is everything; the germ is nothing.” He then lifted a glass of water, contaminated with deadly cholera bacteria, and drank it. He didn’t get sick, proving that his “terrain” was as healthy as he claimed it was. He made his point — germs don’t cause disease. Establishing a foundation of health and vitality, free of toxins, and fostering a strong, balanced immune system, he argued, was more important than killing pathogens.
jeudi 3 décembre 2020
How to explain T2D to patients: Sugar in and Sugar out
 |
| Sugar in and Sugar out, all forms of glucose or simple sugars enter the digestive tract and cannot be removed but only used, urinated, transformed in fat, pushed in muscles |
dimanche 29 novembre 2020
vendredi 27 novembre 2020
High fat diet and muscular pain
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/10/3216/htm
"There seems to be a strong relationship between obesity and pain [4]. Usually, the association between overweight and musculoskeletal pain has been attributed to an increase in the mechanical stress caused by overweight in load bearing joints. However, the literature also shows an association between pain and overweight in joints that do not support load [3,5,6,7,8,9]. For example, associations between overweight and symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hand [5], shoulder and neck pain [6], the number of episodes and intensity of migraine attacks [7,8], even with neuropathic pain [9] have also been described. Thus, the relationship between overweight and musculoskeletal pain appears to be at least, in part, independent of the mechanical overload and probably involves systemic phenomena."
jeudi 26 novembre 2020
Observational studies are misleading and wasting of public money: Vegans and bones
https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-020-01815-3
"Vegans watch your bones..."
This unanimity in the media is totally baseless.
1/ this study is observational and shows only associations.
2/ The absolute risk is 4,8/1000 for meat-eaters, more exactly 47.2 (44.9, 49.7) fractures for 1000 persons during 10 years...
3/ Stating some advice or worse writing a prescription on observational studies is BS or biased governmental bla-bla.
4/ The amount of dairy in the questionnaire needs further analysis.
"
Classification of diet group
At recruitment, participants completed a questionnaire which asked about diet, socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle, and medical history. A follow-up questionnaire which asked similar questions was sent to participants in 2010. Based on the responses to both questionnaires (if the participant completed the follow-up questionnaire), the participants were categorised into meat eaters, fish eaters (did not eat meat but ate fish), vegetarians (did not eat meat or fish, but ate one or both of dairy or eggs), and vegans (participants who did not eat meat, fish, dairy, and eggs) at both time points. Further details on the questionnaires, classification of diet group including agreement of diet group at baseline and follow-up, and data collection of other baseline characteristics can be found in Additional File 1: Supplementary methods [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]."
Same unreliable studies where you sent questionnaires at 10 y interval. The peer review is faulty.
mardi 24 novembre 2020
Quelle dose de vitamine D? Dosing my vitamin D supplementation
Vitamine D3
Raisonner en UI pour les apports
Viser 50 ng/ml en concentration sanguine
Calculer
https://www.grassrootshealth.net/project/dcalculator/
1 ml = XX gouttes
Donc si il y a 10 000 UI/ml c'est 500 UI/goutte mais la solution est visqueuse et une goutte ne contient que 300 UI
1 goutte de Zyma D3 = 300 UI
________________________________________
Vitamin D3
Reason in IU for inputs (do your maths in IU is easier than in micrograms)
Aim for 50 ng/ml in blood concentration
Calculator
https://www.grassrootshealth.net/project/dcalculator/
1 ml = XX drops but due to the viscosity of the solution, 1 drop is 300 UI with the Zyma D3 brand.
So if there are 10 000 IU / ml it is 500 IU / drop
1 drop of Zyma D3 = 300 IUhttp://base-donnees-publique.medicaments.gouv.fr/affichageDoc.php?specid=63902334&typedoc=R#:~:text=Une%20goutte%20contient%20300%20UI%20de%20vitamine%20D3
https://www.grassrootshealth.net/
mercredi 14 octobre 2020
lundi 12 octobre 2020
Zinc
Oysters contain particularly high amounts, with 6 medium oysters providing 32 mg or 291% of the DV.
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/best-foods-high-in-zinc#TOC_TITLE_HDR_7
Vitamine B3 ou PP: sources alimentaires
La vitamine B3 est au centre de nombreux systèmes enzymatiques et singulièrement celles impliquées dans la production d'énergie.
Sources alimentaires:
| Aliments riches en vitamine B3, pour 100 g* | Teneur en vitamine B3 |
| Levure alimentaire | 25 mg |
| Foie de veau cuit | 13,7 mg |
| Thon en boite appertisé, égoutté | 12,6 mg |
| Rognons de porc | 6,1 mg |
| Maquereau fumé | 8,42 mg |
| Poulet | 6,35 mg |
| Champignons crus | 3,61 mg |
| Cacahuètes grillées et salées | 13,6 mg |
| Poire | 0,219 mg |
| Muesli aux fruits ou fruits secs enrichi en vitamines et minéraux | 13,6 mg |
| Pain complet | 2,5 mg |
| Lentilles cuites | 0,664 mg |
| Riz blanc cuit | 0,4 mg |
| Pomme | 0,164 mg |
| Pommes de terre cuites à l’eau | 1,38 mg |
| Artichaut cuit | 1 mg |
| Epinards cuits | 0,49 mg |
| Lait écrémé pasteurisé | 0,09 mg |
| Œufs à la coque | 0,064 mg |
samedi 10 octobre 2020
Are Covid-19 prone individuals NAD deficient?
Check your NAD and supplement if necessary especially in this pandemic.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322475/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jdi.12485
https://nadovim.com/why-science-suggests-nad-might-give-us-a-fighting-chance-against-the-coronavirus-covid-19/
https://www.aboutnad.com/perspectives/raising-nad-levels-with-niagen-nicotinamide-riboside-inhibits-coronavirus-replication-in-preclinical-cell-model
vendredi 9 octobre 2020
mercredi 7 octobre 2020
How to prescribe a vitamin D3 supplement dose when a patient comes back with his/her serum level checking (calculator)
If the patient is deficient in vitamin D.
First give a shot to the patient depending on the weight, age and level of deficiency. From 80k to 200k UI per os of vitamin D3.
First give a shot to the patient depending on the weight, age and level of deficiency. From 80k to 200k UI per os of vitamin D3.
Second, calculate the delay before prescribing the daily dose with this paper (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4128480/)
Third, prescribe the daily dose according to this calculator and check the serum level in 6 months or earlier if the initial level is very low (<10 nanograms/ml).
mardi 22 septembre 2020
jeudi 17 septembre 2020
Taïeb on GMO, did he overemphasized the black swan ?
The GMO plot thickens, in a funny way. I thought that the GMO "experts" are making errors in logic and risk but I realize they do not understand their own claims in their research and contradict them. Many are critical on our focus on "absence of evidence" as "nonscientific" yet their own work is based on this approach (that is, put the weight on the side of absence of evidence)... I repeat, in their own works. Their papers need to abide by a certain statistical procedure yet most don't know what it is about. Looks like they hire some staff person to process data or use some opaque (to them) computerized procedure .
---
For standard statistical theory doesn't allow "acceptance", it only allows "failure to reject". Even when someone in prose says "accept that" he mathematically means "failed to reject at some significance level...", i.e., "BARRING A TAIL EVENT". Similarly, when someone is indicted, he is treated as innocent unless proven otherwise. This principle is adopted by scientific journals (remember that statisticians are the "evidence" police). This is a big thing and it is ironic.
---
The biologists after us don't appear to be aware of the central fact that evidence = "barring a tail event" and argue they have "evidence there can't be a tail event". The fact that statistics is hard for scientists AND they need to use it (as part of their own canon) means they rely on computers or some statistician who happens to be passing by... We mentioned that >50% of published neurobiology papers in "prestigious" journals making comparisons make an elementary (but severe) statistical mistake. But it looks like things are a lot, a lot worse.
---
P.S. As I show in SILENT RISK, acceptance can be done but it needs to be nonprobabilistic s.a. "there exists at least one black swan as I have seen one". As such it is never part of hypothesis testing.
https://www.facebook.com/13012333374/posts/10152632226883375/
mercredi 16 septembre 2020
Covid-19: Sulfatide
mardi 15 septembre 2020
samedi 29 août 2020
vendredi 28 août 2020
dimanche 23 août 2020
jeudi 20 août 2020
samedi 15 août 2020
samedi 25 juillet 2020
Iodine and seaweeds
Iodine is a metalloid, belonging to the group of halogens with Chloride, Fluor... It is considered as a micro-nutrient for humans.
Iodine is a component of seaweeds.
Iodine is a component of seaweeds.
https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/iodine-rich-foods
Iodine can help people with iodine deficiency but could be deleterious in excess. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK501850/
"This is the reason why in 2002, EFSA's Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) suggested a tolerable upper intake level (UL) for adults of 600 μg iodine/day and adjusted this for the remaining age groups based on differences on body surface area (body weight0.75) (European Commission, 2002). "
Iodine can help people with iodine deficiency but could be deleterious in excess. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK501850/
"This is the reason why in 2002, EFSA's Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) suggested a tolerable upper intake level (UL) for adults of 600 μg iodine/day and adjusted this for the remaining age groups based on differences on body surface area (body weight0.75) (European Commission, 2002). "
Table 1
Average (±SD) and range levels (μg/g fdw) of iodine, total arsenic, mercury, lead and cadmium
| No. samples | Iodine | Total arsenica | Mercury | Lead | Cadmium | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average (± SD) | Range (min–max) | Average (± SD) | Range (min–max) | Average (± SD) | Range (min–max) | Average (± SD) | Range (min–max) | Average (± SD) | Range (min–max) | ||
| Phaeophyta (brown algae) | |||||||||||
| Saccharina latissima | 16 | 2,302.5 (1,098.18) | 333.0–4,782.2 | 38.324 (8.713) | 22.504–54.117 | 0.016 (0.005) | 0.007–0.023 | 0.257 (0.222) | 0.072–0.708 | 0.682 (0.216) | 0.231–0.966 |
| Fucus vesiculosus | 27 | 274.9 (75.87) | 137.8–451.2 | 28.379 (19.690) | 10.358–116.677 | 0.012 (0.007) | 0.003–0.042 | 0.897 (1.730) | 0.189–9.601 | 0.780 (0.372) | 0.299–1.969 |
| Fucus spiralis | 1 | 209.52 | – | 8.940 | – | 0.019 | – | 0.956 | – | 0.464 | – |
| Fucus evanescens | 1 | 394.16 | – | 14.084 | – | 0.008 | – | 0.506 | – | 0.520 | – |
| Fucus serratus | 14 | 366.46 (197.92) | 105.2–961.4 | 30.269 (9.579) | 21.457–56.277 | 0.009 (0.003) | 0.005–0.015 | 0.465 (0.177) | 0.236–0.865 | 1.044 (0.339) | 0.628–1.561 |
| Chlorophyta (green algae) | |||||||||||
| Ulva lactuca | 2 | 18.97 (2.52) | 17.2–20.8 | 3.399 (0.293) | 3.192–3.606 | 0.007 (0.002) | 0.005–0.008 | 0.078 (0.019) | 0.064–0.092 | 0.038 (0.030) | 0.0168–0.059 |
| Cladophora sp. | 1 | 140.27 | – | 7.069 | – | 0.007 | – | 1.447 | – | 0.782 | – |
SD: standard deviation.
aData on inorganic arsenic is in preparation.
Table 2
Estimated average and 95th percentile exposure to iodine (μg/day), mercury, lead and cadmium (μg/kg bw per day) due to the consumption of a single serving size of 5 g fdw of seaweed, considering each species individually and altogether. For species with only one representative sample, the total content was considered for exposure calculation
| Iodine (μg/day) | Mercury (μg/kg bw per day) | Lead (μg/kg bw per day) | Cadmium (μg/kg bw per day) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | 95th percentile | Average | 95th percentile | Average | 95th percentile | Average | 95th percentile | |
| Species‐specific exposure | ||||||||
| Fucus vesiculosus | 1,374.6 | 274.9 | 0.00100 | 0.0015 | 0.0747 | 0.14424 | 0.0650 | 0.0928 |
| Fucus serratus | 1,832.2 | 2,523.2 | 0.00099 | 0.0010 | 0.0387 | 0.05998 | 0.0870 | 0.1217 |
| Fucus spiralis | 1,047.6 | – | 0.00161 | – | 0.0796 | – | 0.0387 | – |
| Fucus evanescens | 1,970.8 | – | 0.00069 | – | 0.0421 | – | 0.0433 | – |
| Saccharina latissima | 11,512.3 | 18,677.2 | 0.00135 | 0.0018 | 0.0214 | 0.05380 | 0.0568 | 0.0772 |
| Ulva lactuca | 94.9 | 86.0 | 0.00055 | 0.0004 | 0.0065 | 0.00536 | 0.0031 | 0.0014 |
| Cladophora sp. | 701.3 | – | 0.00062 | – | 0.1205 | – | 0.0652 | – |
| Population of samples | ||||||||
| 4,052.7 | 13,631.1 | 0.0010 | 0.0016 | 0.0521 | 0.0786 | 0.0652 | 0.1194 | |
bw: body weight.
"On the other hand, intake of iodine due to a single serving of seaweed might easily exceed the UL for iodine (600 μg/day for adults and 200 μg/day for children), as observed for all of the species of brown algae and particularly for Saccharina latissima (average > 11,000 μg/day and 95th percentile > 18,000 μg/day). In general, consumption of brown seaweeds rich in iodine, namely Saccharina latissima, once a week would not represent a problem for the general healthy population. However, when considering at high risk subgroups: pregnant women (due to the importance of thyroid hormones in fetal development), children and individuals with thyroid dysfunction, a more careful evaluation regarding the species, amount and frequency of seaweed consumed should be done. Species with lower iodine content should be selected and iodine‐rich species should be avoided due to lack of knowledge on the long‐term exposure effects in fetus and children."
"3.3.3. Iodine
A 7700 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) from Agilent Technologies, equipped with nickel sampler and skimmer cones and a collision/reaction cell, was used for iodine determination. Rh was used as the internal standard. TMAH extracts were conveniently diluted before ICP-MS measurement and the dilution was varied from 1:5 to 1:20. Isotope of 127I was analyzed, with 3.0 mL/min of He as the reaction gas to avoid interferences on this mass. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) of the ICP-MS measurements were 0.5 and 1.3 μg/L, respectively, for I. The accuracy of our method was validated by Seronorm TM trace elements Blood L2 standard reference material. The CRM determination value for I was 86.6 ± 5.8 ng/g, while the reference value on the certificate was 107 ± 22 ng/g."
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)
Articles
